Comparison
Crypto Ninja Trading vs rusich_army
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @crypto_ninja_trading | @rusich_army |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 15,022 | 10,703 |
| Avg views | 31,334 | 83,400 |
| Engagement rate | 208.6% | 779.2% |
| 30-day growth | — | -5.4% |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | — | bots |
| Channel age | 12 days | 10 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@crypto_ninja_trading
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@rusich_army
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.