Comparison
ISHLAR vs TrendWatching
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @ishchi_bor_kerak_ishlar | @trendwatching24 |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 22 | 1.4M |
| Avg views | 90,001 | 85,268 |
| Engagement rate | 409095.5% | 5.9% |
| 30-day growth | +21.2% | +34.4% |
| Language | Русский | Русский |
| Category | — | news |
| Channel age | 29 days | 2419 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@ishchi_bor_kerak_ishlar
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@trendwatching24
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.